As we know, iOS SDK already provides us with UIWebView and Quick Look
Framework for perspective a business request (ppt, xls, doc, though not
xlsx and docx etc.), see this stackoverflow post, however it doesn't offer
support for editing.I did a hunt on internet for a iOS Office SDK (edit)
and we didn't unequivocally find any good answer nonetheless many persons
asked this question. So we guess that it won't harm to ask again in box
any one knows some latest information on this. If we know some SDK
(including blurb ones), greatfully let me know, interjection unequivocally
much.
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Thursday, 3 April 2014
Is Using 'sizeof(char)' When Dynamically Allocating A 'char' Redundant?
When boldly allocating chars, I've always finished it like this:char *pCh
= malloc(NUM_CHARS * sizeof(char));I've recently been told, however, that
controlling sizeof(char) is over-abundance and low because, "by
definition, a distance of a bake is one byte," so we should/could write a
above line like this:char *pCh = malloc(NUM_CHARS);My bargain is a
distance of a bake depends on a internal impression set that is being used
on a aim computer. For example, if a internal impression set is ASCII, a
bake is one byte (8 bits), and if a internal impression set is UNICODE a
bake will indispensably need some-more bytes (> 8 bits).To yield border
portability, wouldn't it be required to use sizeof(char), as malloc simply
allocates 8-bit bytes? Am we disagreement malloc and sizeof(char)?
= malloc(NUM_CHARS * sizeof(char));I've recently been told, however, that
controlling sizeof(char) is over-abundance and low because, "by
definition, a distance of a bake is one byte," so we should/could write a
above line like this:char *pCh = malloc(NUM_CHARS);My bargain is a
distance of a bake depends on a internal impression set that is being used
on a aim computer. For example, if a internal impression set is ASCII, a
bake is one byte (8 bits), and if a internal impression set is UNICODE a
bake will indispensably need some-more bytes (> 8 bits).To yield border
portability, wouldn't it be required to use sizeof(char), as malloc simply
allocates 8-bit bytes? Am we disagreement malloc and sizeof(char)?
Tuesday, 1 April 2014
asp:LinkButton doesn't work from inside an iframe
Suppose that we have an ASP.NET page that is commanded for other sites to
news inside of their . Suppose offer that my page includes some
server-side <asp:LinkButton> controls, that get rendered as <a
href="javascript:__doPostBack(...)"> links. we would be happy if
_doPostBack() would govern within a iframe, though it does not--Instead we
get "_doPostBack not defined" blunder in a console. we assume that is
since it is perplexing to govern it on a outmost page, since it is an
href="javascript:..." couple and not an customary DOM event. How can we
overcome this but changing divided from a LinkButton? Is there a improved
proceed to run a server-side formula we need for clicking a button?EDIT:
we total an a <a href="javascript:alert(document.title)">test</a>and
clicked on it, and we got a due of my outdoor page, not a due of my page
in a iframe.<p />
news inside of their . Suppose offer that my page includes some
server-side <asp:LinkButton> controls, that get rendered as <a
href="javascript:__doPostBack(...)"> links. we would be happy if
_doPostBack() would govern within a iframe, though it does not--Instead we
get "_doPostBack not defined" blunder in a console. we assume that is
since it is perplexing to govern it on a outmost page, since it is an
href="javascript:..." couple and not an customary DOM event. How can we
overcome this but changing divided from a LinkButton? Is there a improved
proceed to run a server-side formula we need for clicking a button?EDIT:
we total an a <a href="javascript:alert(document.title)">test</a>and
clicked on it, and we got a due of my outdoor page, not a due of my page
in a iframe.<p />
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)